RON95 Subsidy May Be Adjusted! Will Media Practitioners Get Back the 300L Quota?

RON95 Subsidy May Be Adjusted! Will Media Practitioners Get Back the 300L Quota?

πŸ“’ RON95 Subsidy May Change! Media Practitioners Could Get Back 300L Quota?

This one hits close to home if you’re in media or constantly on the move for work πŸ‘‡

In Kuala Lumpur, Communications Minister Fahmi Fadzil said he’ll bring a proposal on April 21 to the National Economic Action Council —
πŸ‘‰ to increase the Budi95 fuel subsidy quota for media practitioners.

In simple terms:
The government recently reduced the RON95 subsidy from 300L to 200L per month due to global energy pressures, and a lot of journalists are feeling it.


πŸ’¬ Why are media practitioners pushing back?

Media groups are asking for a special exemption, and honestly, it makes sense:

  • Journalists are constantly on the road
  • Many travel long distances or even across states
  • 200L/month is just… not enough

Especially for those based outside major cities — fuel costs add up fast.


πŸ’‘ What’s being done so far?

The ministry has started introducing hybrid press conferences:

  • If you’re in Putrajaya → attend physically
  • If you’re in KL → join online

πŸ‘‰ It helps reduce travel a bit, but let’s be real — a lot of reporting still requires being on-site.


πŸ€” My take (real talk):

This is one of those policies that sounds fine on paper, but hits differently in real life.

You can’t really tell journalists to:
“Just travel less” or “skip on-ground coverage”

That would directly affect news quality.

So if the 300L quota comes back, it’s not just about subsidies —
it’s also about keeping the media ecosystem running properly.


πŸ“Œ What to watch next:
πŸ‘‰ April 21 — will the proposal get approved?

If yes → big relief for media folks
If no → time to really budget that fuel πŸ˜…


Anyone here working in media?
Is 200L enough for you, or are you already way over?